Will a firearm owner be liable if his gun is stolen and used to commit a crime especially if he does not have it secured?

Will a firearm owner be liable if his gun is stolen and used to commit a crime especially if he does not have it secured?

Firearm ownership comes with great responsibility, and one of the most important responsibilities of a gun owner is to ensure that their firearm is properly secured and kept out of the hands of those who should not have access to it. If a gun is stolen and then used to commit a crime, the question of liability arises - is the owner of the gun responsible for the harm caused by the gun?

The answer to this question is not always clear-cut and can vary depending on the circumstances surrounding the theft and use of the firearm. However, in general, a firearm owner can be held liable for damages resulting from the use of a stolen gun, especially if they did not take proper precautions to secure the weapon.

Most states have laws that require gun owners to store their firearms in a safe or other secure container, and failure to do so can result in criminal charges or civil liability. In addition, if a gun owner knew or should have known that their firearm was at risk of being stolen and did nothing to prevent it, they may also be held liable for any harm caused by the stolen gun.

For example, if a gun owner leaves their firearm unsecured in their car while they go into a store, and the gun is then stolen from the car and used in a robbery, the gun owner could potentially be held liable for damages resulting from the robbery. Similarly, if a gun owner leaves their firearm in an unsecured location in their home and it is stolen, and the stolen gun is then used to commit a homicide, the gun owner could potentially be held liable for the victim's death.

There are some defenses that a gun owner may be able to use to avoid liability in these situations. For example, if the gun owner can demonstrate that they took reasonable steps to secure their firearm, but the theft occurred anyway, they may be able to argue that they should not be held liable for the harm caused by the stolen gun. Additionally, if the gun owner can show that the person who stole the gun was not legally allowed to possess it, they may be able to argue that they should not be held liable for any harm caused by the stolen gun.

It is worth noting that liability for harm caused by a stolen gun is not limited to the gun owner. In some cases, others may also be held liable, such as the person who stole the gun, or the entity that manufactured or sold the gun. However, the gun owner's potential liability in these situations underscores the importance of responsible gun ownership and the need to take all necessary steps to secure firearms and prevent them from falling into the wrong hands.

In conclusion, a firearm owner can be held liable for damages resulting from the use of a stolen gun, especially if they did not take proper precautions to secure the weapon. While there are defenses that a gun owner may be able to use to avoid liability, responsible gun ownership is critical in preventing firearms from being stolen and used to commit crimes. Gun owners should always take steps to secure their firearms and prevent them from falling into the wrong hands.

Back to blog

Leave a comment

Please note, comments need to be approved before they are published.